|
Never Look Away
|
I have often wondered what a non-sentimental biopic of Andy Warhol would
look like (Gus Van Sant’s longstanding Warhol project has, thus far, resulted
in a 2021 stage presentation only). By non-sentimental, I mean a film that
would seriously endeavour to honour the ideas animating Warhol’s work in all
art forms and media – rather than simply taking that work as a very personal
expression of what some regard (and many documentaries duly follow) as his sad,
lonely, shut-in existence.
This is, after all, the easiest and most reassuring
option: rather than trying to deal with the material actuality of his art, any
biographer can read Warhol’s various paintings, prints, Polaroids and movies as
direct reflections of his supposedly alienated and/or hyper-neurotic self.
That’s a way of putting Warhol on the same level of every prospective “average”
filmgoer – maybe even below that level. Poor Andy, look at that miserable guy …
he was even shot by a disgruntled hanger-on at his fortress-like Factory!
Virtually every screen depiction of Warhol that I’ve
seen – including The Doors (1991), Basquiat (1996), I Shot Andy Warhol (1996)
and Factory Girl (2006) – adheres to
this properly Romantic conception of the artist. Even as Warhol himself was no
kind of floridly expressive Romantic – which, in this context, refers to the
old-fashioned idea that art always flows, more or less directly, from the
emotions and experiences of the person who makes it. Australian cinema has
given us a grunge version of this Romantic viewpoint in Acute Misfortune (2019), covering the last years of the Archibald-winning Adam Cullen – the
period in which this artist is definitely on the skids and not producing his
best work, but all the same manages to mirror his Dark Soul in every word,
image and deed.
What’s missing from the sentimental, Romantic biopics
of artists is any reckoning with the intellectual or conceptual aspects of art
– especially modern art. This challenge – virtually untouched by mainstream
cinema in any country – is what drew me to check out the German production by
Florian Henckel von Donnersmack, Never
Look Away. It is a thinly disguised biopic of the great (and complex)
German painter, Gerhard Richter (born 1932) – concentrating on his childhood
and early adult years, and culminating in his first successful exhibition. That
choice of focus is already a good clue as to the movie’s true intentions.
So, Richter here becomes Kurt Barnert (played as an
adult by Tom Schilling, and as a child by Cai Cohrs) – and the teacher who had the biggest
influence on him at the famed Düsseldorf Art Academy, Joseph Beuys (1921-1986),
rather hilariously becomes Antonius van Verten (Oliver Masucci). But the story
begins long before the would-be artist reaches school; first, it plunges us
into a socio-political melodrama (Donnersmack’s specialty).
Little Kurt is illicitly introduced to the joys of
Nazi-condemned Degenerate Art by his free-spirit auntie, Elisabeth (Saskia
Rosendahl). In the type of broad, unarguable blow to the patriarchy that
Donnersmack likes to deliver, Elisabeth falls foul of the sinister designs of
Dr Carl Seeband (Sebastian Koch), who runs a Women’s Clinic in strict accord
with his SS principles. This character almost gets his own mini-film, as we are
filled in on his wildly changing fortunes across time.
As Kurt grows up, he finds love and happiness with
(ominously) another Elisabeth, Ellie (Paula Beer from Christian Petzold’s Transit [2018]); the birth of their first child (and the
painting Kurt makes in relation to it) is a sentimental highlight of the
narrative. But there’s a complication looming: Ellie is the daughter of Dr
Seeband. This sets the stage for both strategic concealments and dramatic
revelations in the post-war era of Germany’s history – especially hinging on
the provable (or not) extent of Seeband’s prior involvement with certain, high-ranking
Nazis.
Warning: the proper title of the film – clearly judged
too conceptual by half for the English-speaking market – is Work Without Author. That’s a bold
title, and one that is true, at the very least, to one of Richter’s stated
intentions as a practitioner of art: to disappear behind the work, and have it stand
and speak for itself. His is a fully anti-Romantic position, chiming in with an
entire, imposing conceptual art scene built around Beuys and Richter, then and
since.
But Donnersmack’s film aims to prove the precisely opposite
viewpoint: that Richter’s art is work with an author, fed – albeit secretly and cryptically – by long-buried
autobiographical events. Although Richter gave Donnersmack access to his life
to the extent of allowing hours of intimate conversation, the artist finally got
antsy about the whole project and refused to watch the completed film after
glimpsing its trailer. I don’t blame him one bit.
Two main strands feed into Donnersmack’s anti-conceptual
push. The first is the portrayal of van Verten/Beuys and his extremely
dictatorial method of art education (students must attend his all his free-form
lectures, but he will never deign to look at any of their fledgling work). The
young conceptualists under the master’s tutelage are all parodied as fools or
opportunists (in another hopeful Me Too gesture, Donnersmack includes the
vignette of a female performance artist whose work is deemed awful, but who is
tolerated because she “has great breasts”). And the big moment comes when van
Verten admits to Kurt that the obsessive materials of his own art – namely, fat
and felt – can be traced to deep, never-forgotten, primal life experiences …
So, Beuys was a closet Romantic, after all!
The second and major strand of the film draws upon a
strange and essentially true concatenation of events and details – a
conjunction of which Richter himself was not entirely aware until an intrepid
biographer unearthed them and brought the matter to the artist’s attention. In
one of his “breakthrough” paintings – cleverly deforming a figurative style
that he was soon to swap for more abstract realms – Richter used photographic
projection and mirror reflections in order to arrange, on one canvas, the figures
who are (in the film) his Aunt Elisabeth, Dr Seeband and the high-ranking Nazi
official whose legacy is being investigated. Richter did not consciously know
the historical backstory linking these three people – but his unconscious
processes led him to an undoubtedly uncanny intuition of the truth. Even at the
Düsseldorf Academy, it seems, the creativity and heart of art (and its seething
unconscious) can be reborn!
Donnersmack is best known for The Lives of Others (2006), a historical thriller about the
activities of the Stasi during the 1980s. It was a popular movie that ticked
every box which the middlebrow arthouse market requires: it was slick, a little
bit political, entertaining, and tied up all its loose ends into a neat bundle.
It offered an individualised “human story” as well as a collective, social one.
Personally speaking, it’s not my preferred kind of cinema, but it kept me
watching for the duration, and I could at least admire its basic level of film
craft.
Never Look Away is less taut in
its construction, and is prone to repeating its “big moments” – such as an
impromptu symphony of bus horns staged and conducted by both Aunt Elisabeth and
Kurt – across the span of years. Of such grand epiphanies
are Romantic artist biopics made!
© Adrian Martin June 2019 |