|
Capone
|
When Sergio Leone’s Once Upon a Time in America appeared in 1984 – ah yes, I remember
it well! – it seemed to be twilight time for the gangster genre. That film
presented itself as the hollowed-out shell of a typical gangster movie: there
were fine scenes of criminal action, carousing and violence alright, but they
took a decided second place to the overpowering waves of melancholia
constructed via an elaborate flashback structure. Regrets: these hoods – at
least the ones who managed to survive into old age – had many (to turn the
Sinatra standard on its head).
Ever since – for 36 years now! – gangster films have
been churning over this passage from the boisterous action-image into the
reflective time-image. Martin Scorsese personally replayed the entire cycle in
high style, from Goodfellas (1990) through Casino (1995) to the ultra-sad The Irishman (2019), with a stopover in TV for Boardwalk Empire (2010-2014). Michael Mann dwells, variously, in
the way-stations between these extreme points of the genre. The examples can be
multiplied, and indeed I already found myself doing that math in my 1998 book
on Once Upon a Time in America.
But Capone jumps, from the word go, into a post-genre abyss. There are no normal
flashbacks to the daring exploits of yesteryear; no trial scenes or backstory
(only of the most attenuated, allusive sort). Even the burst of a stray Tommy
Gun (that manages to find its way into the gangster’s hands) turns out to be
something miserable and pathetic: there is no glorious, death-driven last stand
for any Tony Montana figure here. Capone gives it to you up front: it’s a
gangster movie under the sign of neurosyphilis,
no less. Ouch!
I was intrigued by Josh Trank’s debut feature, the
supernatural parable Chronicle (2012)
– arresting enough even on a tiny screen in the middle of an international plane
flight. I skipped his entry in the superhero cycle (Fantastic Four, 2015) and landed on Capone, the oddness of which a few critics insisted on and
championed (another intriguing feature: its producer is Lawrence Bender, known
for his association with Tarantino; his main non-TV credits in recent years
have been Neil Jordan’s Greta [2018] and Scorsese’s Silence [2016]). And odd, Capone surely is.
From the very beginning, we are in a ghostly Theatre
of Memory, with Capone (Tom Hardy) wandering down the empty corridors of his Scarface-style Florida mansion, chasing
a little boy holding a balloon, or (later on) making his way through a
seemingly infinite ballroom and sharing a croaky duet with Louis Armstrong (Troy
Anderson) on “Blueberry Hill”. Meanwhile, in the realm of dour reality,
everything is literally for sale, with Capone’s art collection being carted
off; times are hard for ex-crooks out of jail.
In the hero’s hyper-subjective dreamland, however, there
are more than a few allusions to Stanley Kubrick’s The Shining (1980) – not to mention Agent Cooper’s movements
through the various Lodges of the afterlife in Twin Peaks (1990-1991, 2017) – but I kept flashing (pertinently or not) onto Alain
Resnais’ Providence (1977). After
all, that haunted-memory-piece was the first to make a blackly comic show of
the central character’s blasted incontinence, which is such a prominent feature
here (alongside the chomped cigars that get swapped out, on medical orders, for
carrots).
For a few minutes into Capone, I nurtured positive expectations. The faded hero (usually
addressed here as Fonse – “happy days”, indeed) who listens to his own mediatic
myth recycled on sensational radio re-enactments; the Marienbad-like camera-prowls along ornate architectural fittings
(Resnais, again); the tensions with his wife, Mae (Linda Cardellini) and, less
interestingly, his “lost” son, Tony (Mason Guccione) – all this held a glimmer
of something.
I figured the excessive make-up effects – after The Irishman, gangsters are really
afflicted with face-trouble – might calm down, or become less noticeable. They
do not. Hardy goes far out on a crazy trajectory of grotesque decrepitude; it’s
hard to follow him all the way. I shifted my expectation: in its excess, could Capone be re-introducing Trank as a
curious between-trash-and-art figure like Matthew Bright, whose promising writer-director
career started so well with Freeway (1996) and,
ultimately (or to date, at any rate), so sadly hit the rocks after Tiptoes (2003)? Capone occasionally reminded me of Bright’s disquieting Bundy (2002) or Freeway II: Confessions of a Trickbaby (1999). But not enough to
ease the overall pain.
Not terribly much happens in the script (handled, like
the editing, by Trank). There’s only one point of intrigue, floating above it
all: where did Capone hide his apparently vast reserve of criminally-ill-gained
moolah? As in Sally Potter’s The Roads Not Taken (2019), we are plunged into strange scenes that seem a bit impossible, like
Capone tearing off from his mansion to go on a jolly boat fishing trip with his
old pal, Johnny (Matt Dillon – and just who is that figure meant to be in the
real gangster history? Anybody in particular, or just a representative
amalgam?).
These scenes indeed are impossible – especially given
that Johnny is long dead, betrayed and sentenced to execution by Capone
himself. Sometimes we get the retrospective tip-off of that impossibility, with
Capone coming back to semi-consciousness after a stroke episode; sometimes we
don’t. We are meant to just drift, uneasily, through what Charles Brackett once
called (in reference to his own script-in-progress) “a not very arresting blur
of episodes”. Capone becomes a dreamlike
haze, pitched somewhere between David Lynch and Inception (2010) – the latter, especially, when the digital
water-wave effects come thundering down on our blanked-out, (literally) shitty
Mr Big.
As in many a gangster picture, there is another, less
zonked-out, all-pervasive consciousness occasionally intruding via
audio-surveillance apparatuses: the government agents who, too, want to know
where all that dough is stashed (don’t we all?). There is a good moment when
even Capone’s personal doctor, Karlock (Kyle MacLachlan), is revealed to be
part of this omni-invasive “sting”. But not even the Doctoral tricks of
Freudian free association and auto-suggestive sketching can unearth what is
simply no longer there in Capone’s neurosyphilitic head (if the film is trying
to play on the ambiguity that the mobster may simply be dissembling – as is
suggested at one point – the vacillation doesn’t work).
I kept imagining a Brian De Palma/Snake Eyes-type
finale in which the camera alone, beyond any fictive POV, would X-ray this notorious
hiding place for cash inside that garish statue Capone keeps eyeing on his
front lawn – after it has been carted off to the dark shelter of some
provincial county art museum. Alas, instead, a bit of dreary, uneventful what-happened-after on-screen narration/exposition once again deflated my hope.
© Adrian Martin 18 May 2020 |