|
Call Me Mum
|
Perhaps
more than any other image, the spectacle of a “stolen child” – a child taken
away from its natural parents by a malevolent State authority – crystallises
the widespread sense that the modern world is wracked by, even defined by,
pervasive trauma.
This
is so not only in Australia, with its shameful history of the Stolen Generation
of indigenous children. In Michael Haneke’s Austrian film Cache (2005), all the nameless foreboding that is built up around
the central French-bourgeois character – just what did he do to that Algerian
pal of his back in the early 1960s? – comes down to a simple but devastating
sight: a child being placed in a car and driven away, bound for State care.
It
is as if we have all been unconsciously seeking this image which could grab all
the ‘big picture’ issues of the past century – all the wars, massacres, exiles
and imprisonments – and bring them down to the point where we can best
understand them, where they touch upon the most personal and intimate of
experiences: family life.
Although
you may not have heard much about it since its official film festival premieres,
Margot Nash’s Call Me Mum is among
the finest of recent Australian films – certainly one of the most affecting and
resonant. It is set to appear SBS television, and TV is, in many senses, its
most natural home: like Alan Bennett’s TV works, it is shaped as a series of
interwoven monologues addressed straight to camera.
Yet Call Me Mum can also stand on its
feet as a film projected in a cinema, thanks to the careful, subtle, intricate
stylisation brought to the project by an ace team including cinematographer
Andrew de Groot, editor Denise Haratzis and composer David Bridie.
Five
characters are about to meet. Two are on a plane: Kate (Catherine McClements)
and his Torres Strait foster son, Warren (Dayne Christian). Kate is bringing
Warren to his biological mother, Flo (Vicki Saylor), who is slowly dying in a
Brisbane hospital. Kate’s parents, Dellmay (Lynette Curran) and Keith (Ross
Thompson) – ‘Dellkeith’, as they are collectively known – also await the
arrival of the pair, although they bear less goodwill than Flo.
“Call
me Mum” – there is a lot hidden in that simple title. Warren has two mums. Kate
has rejected and shut out her mother for many years. Flo hopes that not only
Warren but also Kate will call her Mum. Both Dellmay and Keith reminisce about
their respective mothers. Certain phrases – about “marrying down”, for instance
– recur uncannily from one story, one history to the next. Everyone seems
connected, in one way or another, by blood ties or shared experience – and yet
everyone seems so painfully divided from all the rest, and so alone. The
monologue form gives an artistic shape to this omnipresent solitude.
Kathleen
Mary Fallon, author of the classic novel Working
Hot (1989), is among the most talented writers in Australia. Although
inspired by her real-life history as the foster mother of a Torres Strait
Islander, Call Me Mum is not a
confessional or autobiographical piece. If it is at all therapeutic, that is
because, as Fallon attests, she needed the “freedom of fiction” to create some
space around her experience and make sense out of it.
Fallon
is not in search of easy resolutions: some sentimental redemption for all the
characters, united in a facile allegory of Utopian reconciliation. Closer in
tone to a film like Atom Egoyan’s disquieting The Sweet Hereafter (1997) – another drama that maps social
disintegration onto family despair – Call
Me Mum stays tightly fixed on emotions of mutual hatred, suspicion and
bitterness. For Fallon, the question of the piece is: “As Australians, would we
rather die than change our story; would we rather kill than have it genuinely
challenged?”
Warren
– who has suffered various waves of physical and mental retardation – is no
innocent victim that you can simply clasp to your bosom and love. Kate – who
does indeed love him – has a dozen unflattering nicknames for Warren; he’s
noisy, smelly, uncontrollable, sly, manipulative. He even sends the
unsuspecting passenger next to him on the plane fleeing in no time at all.
What
has brought all five characters together in this story is a TV show on which
Warren appeared: egged on to ‘out’ himself as one of the Stolen Generation, he
tells horrendous lies about Kate and what she has done for him. Then again, it
must be hard for Warren, after all he has been through, to tell the difference
between inner fantasy, outer reality, and everything he is being fed
intersubjectively (so to speak), especially when the media come calling.
At
the other extreme of social experience is the home and hearth of Dellkeith.
There is a touch of Barry Humphries-style satire in this portrait of white
Australia: pastel colour scheme, furnishings from the 1950s, tea sets and
doilies. If there is an obvious (perhaps too obvious) villain in the piece,
it’s Dellmay: Lynette Curran relishes every ghastly thing that comes out of her
character’s mouth (like “A mother can’t help that first surge of love,
apparently”), while the passive-aggressive Keith sits in the background and
waves imaginary danger-warning signals to Kate and Warren in their descending
plane.
But
Keith, finally upright in his Digger’s hat, gets to voice the most devastating speech
of the piece: an ironic “I’m sorry" chant that burrows right inside the
conservative values of ordinary Australians. Like much of what we hear in the
film, it’s funny, frightening and confronting all at the same time.
Call Me Mum covers
a lot of ground in its mere 76 minutes. The stories of the past tumble out,
taking in a large array of cultures and situations. Like everyone in the film,
Flo is mixed-up and fucked-up: sex, booze, violence, social exclusion, failure
to be a “good mother” … it's all there. She speaks of what it means to be both
Malay and an Islander: to one group she is an “outcast”, and to the other she
is a “dirty Islander”.
Fallon
soft-pedals none of this difficult material. The quasi-Joycean wordplay that
she perfected in her novels here slips unobtrusively into everyday speech:
Warren mistakes the word “genocide” for “genderslide”, and the infinite Aussie
capacity to prefix every intimate acquaintance’s name with “poor old …” assumes
new and awesome meaning.
But
none of this would work as well if Margot Nash (it’s been over a decade since
her previous feature, the excellent Vacant Possession) had not made it so
thoroughly cinematic. It is an intriguing fact that women formed in the radical
movements of the ‘70s, such as Nash, Sue Brooks (who was originally slated to
direct Call Me Mum), Kathryn Millard
and (in New Zealand) Gaylene Preston are, without a doubt, the most
intellectual and artistically rigorous of the filmmakers in the region.
Here,
Nash is able to postpone the thought in the viewer’s mind that this is, after
all, rather stagey material. She transforms each locale – plane, hospital,
lounge room – into something subtly unreal, a kind of fantasy projection from
out of the characters’ heads. Music and other sound effects very quietly – in
an almost ghostly fashion – underscore allusions and emotions hidden in the
text.
The
actors, under Nash’s guidance, manage to form an ensemble – even as they
inhabit their own, lonely worlds, and hardly ever get to perform ‘with’ each
other. Even the central image that haunts the entire proceedings – Warren as an
archetypal stolen child, either in the long-ago past or again in the imminent
future – is given an unreal, dreamlike aura by Nash, as if it could just as
well be a disturbance arising from our collective social memory as an actual,
documentable event.
In
truth, I like Call Me Mum best for
its first 60 minutes, before the various threads finally come together,
cataclysmically. How fascinating – and risky – it could have been to leave the
entire piece suspended, on the brink of a narrative conclusion (as presumably
Fallon’s prior theatrical version did), before the various characters either
encounter or fail to encounter each other.
That
is the only touch of melodrama in what is otherwise a cleverly minimalist piece
– and, lord knows, Australia has hardly kept pace with the great art cinemas of
Asia or Iran in the conquest of screen minimalism.
Then
again, how could it be possible to tell any “mixed race” story in the fraught,
contemporary context of Australian society without at least some stain of
melodramatic loss, crisis and trauma?
MORE Nash: The Silences © Adrian Martin January 2007 |